Poker » Blog Archive » ID Your Opponent to Maximize Value at the Texas Hold em Poker Table


ID Your Opponent to Maximize Value at the Texas Hold em Poker Table

[ English ]

There are numerous kinds of Hold’em Poker gambler, and, of course, a lot of levels of understanding in between those players. Texas hold’em the card casino game is similar to pushing spaghetti around a bowl – some will have far more, others will get less and the casino always takes a slice. The figures of cards over time stipulate that we all have the same opportunities. The key to making the most of our possible gains is to rapidly determine your opponent form and skill level. If you’ll be able to correctly recognize your opponent then you can be able to adjust your playing style to maximize your win, and just as significantly, minimize your loss.

Let us review the numerous wagering styles that you just will are available across in an average Holdem Poker cash game. Players will either be:

� Rocks

� Tight Players

� Calling Stations

� Maniacs

And within these styles you are going to find a range of aggression that goes from passive to aggressive. What follows are a number of strategic hints and tips to support you bet on versus each form of poker gambler in an internet environment.


Rocks are the most typical type of Texas hold’em Player. They are the easiest to beat and usually are inexperienced new players who think the game revolves close to the cards which are dealt. It’s also probably the most natural wagering fashion and so you will appear across them regularly. These are the people you really should appearance to wager on against. Controlled aggression could be the way to proceed. Bet at these gamblers when flops seem ugly and they’ll most likely fold. If they re-raise you in return, step aside and let them take the hand, coming right back at them subsequent round. A rock who has been sitting folding the last twenty hands, only to appear out betting, will be the easiest read of all. In case you can’t see them coming then I’d suggest you take up a unique game.

Tight Gamblers

Tight players are usually battle hardened. The difference among a tight gambler and a rock is always that they understand the must appear out additional typically, with the occasional bluff here and there. Much more importantly they usually use the time spent sitting out, to identify opponent characteristics to be able to wager on their weaknesses. The ideal of all gamblers sit in this category – Tight Intense No Limit Texas hold em players ought to be identified early on and avoided in any way cost. Discover one and you must re-examine your table selection (yes you really should move table). Real life examples of this type of gambler would be Howard Lederer and Erick Lindgren.

Calling Stations

Calling stations present an interesting playing fashion and would be the 2nd most widespread variety you will discover in online poker. By definition fairly weak, these gamblers rarely take the initiative and thereby have to depend on the luck of running up against an aggressive gambler whilst holding the nut or near nut hand. Much more frequently than not these people will lose because they are:

1) Betting their cards and not their competition
2) Have no initiative

Three) Often rely on card catching strategies

It’s worth pointing out at this stage that card catching is a poor idea in practically any circumstances (except as part of a semi-bluff wager on).


Maniacs are a rare breed of gambler seldom noticed in low limit or tournament Texas hold em Poker games. They have no fear of losing, indeed it will seem like they wish to, and it can be this that sets them apart from most gamblers online today. Difficult to bet on in opposition to, these competitors depend on your fear of losing your stack to gain chips. Usually witnessed with large chip stacks relative to the table, Maniacs will wager large often, and whatever hand you choose to bet on, it’s probably that you just will have to be prepared to go all-in with it. No card catching versus these competitors – in case you try you can be punished.

The identification of Maniacs is easy, as is your assault on their betting style. Clearly the weakness these gamblers have is always that they are susceptible to big pocket pairs (Ace-Ace, King-King, Queen-Queen, even Ak). The problems is that you will probably must wait a very good variety of cards before you receive to bet on such a hand. Maniacs are far from stupid (they often evolve in experience terms from Rocks or Calling Stations that have go through Doyle Brunson’s Super System books and progressed from there. To hit them properly you need to either get lucky early on with the large pair or wager on sufficient cards so you are not identified as a waiting Rock (obviously you don’t want them to receive out of your way when the time is suitable).

In the event you beat an aggressive Maniac once, you are going to locate they go on Tilt seriously easily, which gives further chance for the brave. I remember hitting one for eight hundred dollars from 200 dollars in 3 hands because he went all-in 3 times in a row with no cards at all. He incorrectly judged that I would fold rather than re-stake my whole winnings on each of the next two poker hands. Luckily for me they were relatively solid starting hands in the circumstances except I can tell you it’s not easy going all-in pre-flop for 500 dollars with just King Jack. I would be mad to do that in any other circumstance but I felt I had a great study about the gambler form and his hand which turned out to be 92 unsuited did not stand up.

Hopefully you will observe wagering styles and appearance to pick off Rocks and Calling Stations. When you come up towards a tight (particularly Tight Intense) gambler, with no other easy to beat players close to, you ought to move on. I’ve been at a lot of tables where the poor players have lost and left, the great ones remain, and one off those triggers the table’s break up by saying "no easy money here, the only winner will be the rake, let us move on." If you’ve not had this said to you, or you’ve not made the declaration yourself then contemplate that you simply may well be a fish.